Trending TopicsIpl 2024Lok Sabha 2024

---Advertisement---

Lost Home, Jailed For Months, Muslim Teen Punished For ‘Spitting’ On Hindu Rally, Now Witness Flip-Flops

Post the alleged incident, Adnan's family had to witness the demolition of their home, justified by local authorities as encroachment.

Edited By : Saurav Gupta | Updated: Jan 18, 2024 14:42 IST
Share :
Ujjain: Lost Home, Jailed For Months, Muslim Teen Punished For 'Spitting' On Hindu Rally
Ujjain: Lost Home, Jailed For Months, Muslim Teen Punished For 'Spitting' On Hindu Rally

Adnan Mansuri, an 18-year-old, faced 151 days in judicial custody for an alleged incident of spitting during a Hindu religious procession in his hometown Ujjain. This seemingly minor act led to a cascade of events, including the demolition of his family’s home on grounds of encroachment.

Ujjain – Home Demolition Drama:

Post the alleged incident, Adnan’s family had to witness the demolition of their home, justified by local authorities as encroachment. As the bulldozer razed their dwelling, a DJ system blared loud music and dhols beat in a display of force. The move was further underscored by a BJP spokesperson’s ominous statement about those who insult Lord Shiva facing consequences.

Bail Granted Amid Witness Contradictions:

After spending five months behind bars, Adnan, along with his minor brothers, was granted bail. The turning point came when the complainant, also the prime witness, refused to identify him during the trial. The Madhya Pradesh High Court noted the witness’s turning hostile and lack of support for the prosecution’s case.

Read More: ‘SCARS OF 1947: Real Partition Stories’ Review: Unheard tales, sea of ​​emotions buried in Rajeev Shukla’s mind

Ujjain – Charges and Hostile Witnesses:

Adnan and his brothers faced charges of outraging religious feelings, promoting enmity, disturbing religious assembly, and public mischief. However, witness contradictions emerged as the complainant and another witness turned hostile, challenging the prosecution’s narrative.

Witness Sawan Lot’s Testimony:

Sawan Lot, the complainant also told NDTV that he did not know Adnan and refused to identify him during a video call from jail to court. While he acknowledged recognizing the other two boys at the incident spot, he deemed the demolition of Adnan’s house unnecessary.

Legal Counsel’s Critique:

Devendra Singh Sengar, counsel for the accused Told NDTV and highlighted inadequacies in the investigation, emphasizing witness inconsistencies. He argued that the prosecution failed to establish a solid case, shedding light on the lack of careful examination in a religiously sensitive matter.

Father’s Resilience Amid Loss:

Adnan’s father, Ashraf, expressed relief at his son’s release but lamented the loss of their home. He insisted on the children’s acquittal and downplayed the demolition, citing an imminent anti-encroachment campaign.

Read More: Maharashtra: Social media posts hailing Aurangzeb cause riots in Kolhapur

Ujjain Police Silence on Sub-Judice Matter:

At the Kharakuwa police station, where the FIR was filed, officers remained tight-lipped, stating that the investigation was complete, and the charge sheet filed. The matter being sub-judice, they refrained from providing further details.

First published on: Jan 18, 2024 02:42 PM IST

Get Breaking News First and Latest Updates from India and around the world on News24. Follow News24 on Facebook, Twitter.

Related Story