---Advertisement---

India

Supreme Court: Laws For Women’s Welfare Are Not Tools To Threaten Or Extort Husbands

Supreme Court of India has recently highlighted the importance of using laws meant for women's welfare responsibly, emphasizing that these laws should not be misused to threaten or extort husbands

The Supreme Court of India recently emphasized that laws designed to protect women should not be misused to threaten or extort their husbands. This statement came during a case where the court dissolved a marriage after determining that it had irretrievably broken down. The court’s decision highlighted concerns about the increasing misuse of serious allegations in matrimonial disputes.

Key Observations From The Supreme Court

Protection vs. Misuse: The court noted that provisions in criminal law, such as those addressing cruelty and rape, are meant for the protection and empowerment of women. However, they have been misapplied by some women to settle personal scores with their husbands. The justices warned against using these laws as tools for intimidation or financial gain.

---Advertisement---

Combined Allegations: In many recent cases, serious charges like cheating, cruelty, and rape have been grouped together in complaints against husbands. The court condemned this practice, stating that such actions can lead to unjust consequences and escalate conflicts unnecessarily.

Marriage As A Sacred Institution: The justices described marriage as a sacred bond rather than a commercial venture, urging couples to resolve disputes amicably instead of resorting to legal battles. They stressed that laws should be applied thoughtfully and not as weapons in personal vendettas.

---Advertisement---

Context Of The Ruling

The ruling arose from a case involving a couple who had been married for only a few months before their relationship deteriorated. The wife had filed multiple criminal complaints against her husband, which included serious allegations that contributed to the breakdown of their marriage. The court decided to intervene under Article 142 of the Constitution, which allows it to dissolve marriages when necessary.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s message is clear: while laws exist to protect women’s rights and welfare, they must be used responsibly and not as tools for harassment or extortion. The court’s ruling serves as a reminder for all parties involved in marital disputes to approach their issues with fairness and integrity, fostering an environment where justice prevails without misuse of legal protections.

Also Read: Shashi Tharoor Reacts On FIR Against Rahul Gandhi – ‘The Matter Shouldn’t Have Been Dragged To Court’

First published on: Dec 20, 2024 12:32 PM IST


Get Breaking News First and Latest Updates from India and around the world on News24. Follow News24 on Facebook, Twitter.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Related Story

Live News

---Advertisement---


live

News Highlights 24th December: Massive blast rocks Bangladesh, one dead, several injured

Dec 24, 2025
Breaking News LIVE Updates
  • 21:45 (IST) 24 Dec 2025

    Breaking news live updates: Bengaluru Techie shoots wife in broad daylight after he gets divorce notice from her

N24 Shorts Logo

SHORTS

Tension rises in Bangladesh as Osman Hadi's brother issues chilling warning to Yunus, threatens him...
World

Tension rises in Bangladesh as Osman Hadi’s brother issues chilling warning to Yunus, threatens him…

Bangladesh has been gripped by unrest after youth leader Sharif Osman Hadi died from gunshot injuries sustained during an election event. At his funeral, his brother made a shocking claim, warning interim leader Muhammad Yunus.

View All Shorts

---Advertisement---

Trending