weather_iconDublin | 14.5 °C | AQI 17
Wednesday, 20 November, 2024

---Advertisement---

India

Supreme Court Declares: Anti-Encroachment Drives Must Be Fair, Unbiased, No Religious Exemptions

The court emphasised that India is a secular country and its directions for bulldozer action and anti-encroachment drives will be for all citizens

Supreme Court Declares: Anti-Encroachment Drives Must Be Fair, Unbiased, No Religious Exemptions
Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that public safety is of prime importance and any religious structure encroaching upon a road, water bodies, or rail tracks must go. The court further emphasised that India is a secular country and its directions for bulldozer action and anti-encroachment drives will be for all citizens, irrespective of the religion they follow.

What Did The SC Say?

The bench headed by Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan was hearing petitions challenging bulldozer action against people accused of crimes. However, State authorities said that only illegal constructions are demolished in cases where a person is accused of crime.

---Advertisement---

The court said, “Whether it be temple or dargah, it has to go. Public safety is paramount.”

Bulldozer action carrying demolition against people accused of crime has become popular now. This action has raised concern about targeted demolition against a particular community or religion.

---Advertisement---

The court added,“We are a secular country and our directions will be for all, irrespective of religion or community. Of course, for encroachment we have said… if it is on a public road, footpath, water body or railway line area, it has to go, public safety is paramount. If there is any religious structure in the middle of the road, be it Gurudwara or Dargah or Temple, it cannot obstruct public.”

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat. Mehta said that bulldozer action against any criminal is not justified. He also stressed on advance notification to ensure fairness. “Absolutely not, even for heinous crimes like rape or terrorism. Like my lord said it cannot also be that the notice issued is stuck one day before, it has to be in advance,” said Mehta.

Supreme Court on 17 September had passed an interim order saying that no demolition of properties, including those of accused in crime shouldn’t take place till October 1, without its permission.

Also Read: Lucknow Man Murders Delivery Agent After Ordering Expensive Smartphones On COD

HISTORY

Written By

News24 Desk


Get Breaking News First and Latest Updates from India and around the world on News24. Follow News24 on Facebook, Twitter.

Related Story

Live News

---Advertisement---


live

Latest LIVE News Trending Today, Real Time Updates: Assam’s Karimganj District Renamed Sribhumi, Honoring Rabindranath Tagore’s Legacy

Nov 19, 2024
Latest LIVE News Trending Today, Real Time Updates
  • 21:04 (IST) 19 Nov 2024

    BJP Chief JP Nadda Praises ‘The Sabarmati Report’ for Exposing Truth Behind Godhra Tragedy

  • 19:33 (IST) 19 Nov 2024

    Assam Government Renames Karimganj District as Sribhumi

  • 17:39 (IST) 19 Nov 2024

    EAM S Jaishankar Meets Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi

N24 Shorts Logo

SHORTS

Maharashtra elections
India

Stage Set For Thackeray vs. Shinde Showdown in 51 Maharashtra Assembly Seats

This election transcends numbers; it’s a battle for the legacy of Bal Thackeray. Both factions aim to claim the ideological and emotional heart of the Shiv Sena’s base.

View All Shorts

---Advertisement---

Trending