---Advertisement---

India

J&K High Court’s Major Ruling For Govt Employees On Changing Date of Birth In Service Records

The court pointed out that his service records were created based on the documents he himself had submitted at the time of joining.

In a big ruling, The Jammu and Kashmir High Court has held that the date of birth declared by a Government servant and thereafter recorded by the appropriate authority in the service book or any other record, shall not be subject to any alteration, except in the case of a clerical error, without the orders of the Government.

---Advertisement---

Background

The appellant had submitted his credentials at the time of joining his service, which recorded his date of birth as 1953—a detail he had also signed off on in his service records. However, decades later, he claimed to have discovered that this information was incorrect. To support his claim, he presented a medical certificate as evidence.

---Advertisement---

Seeking official recognition of the supposed error, he approached the civil court for a declaration. However, the trial court dismissed his suit, citing both the statute of limitations and service rules that prohibit altering one’s date of birth more than five years after submitting credentials. His appeal before the Additional District Judge met the same fate and was also dismissed.

According to a Live Law report, The court also held that no alteration in the date of birth of the employee can be made by the administrative department unless the employee has approached the Government within a period of five years and demonstrated that such a mistake was genuine and bona fide.

---Advertisement---

The Bench

A bench led by Justice Vinod Chatterji Kaul ruled against the appellant, noting that he had not approached the department within the stipulated five-year period. The court pointed out that his service records were created based on the documents he himself had submitted at the time of joining. It further emphasized that no government job applicant can later claim ignorance of their own credentials or testimonials. The court observed that the appellant was attempting to alter his date of birth to appear five years younger, seemingly to extend his tenure and avail additional service benefits.

First published on: Feb 18, 2025 03:22 PM IST


Get Breaking News First and Latest Updates from India and around the world on News24. Follow News24 on Facebook, Twitter.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Related Story

Live News

---Advertisement---


live

India 80-2 (10.3 overs) | IND U19 vs PAK U19 Live Score: Vaibhav Suryavanshi & Ayush Mhatre OUT

Dec 14, 2025
Vaibhav Suryavanshi will be in action for India vs Pakistan match
  • 12:11 (IST) 14 Dec 2025

    IND vs PAK, U19 Asia Cup: Ayush Mhatre OUT

N24 Shorts Logo

SHORTS

US Brown University Shooting
World

US: Two killed, eight critically injured in mass shooting at Brown University, President Trump responds

US Brown University Shooting: The university confirmed the fatalities, adding that eight injured were rushed to the hospital and are reported to be in 'critical' but stable condition.

View All Shorts

---Advertisement---

Trending