weather_iconDublin | 12.88 °C | AQI 5
Sunday, 24 November, 2024

---Advertisement---

India

Jharkhand Files Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Delay In High Court Chief Justice Appointment

This delay goes against Article 216 of the Constitution, which says that every high court should have a chief justice and other judges.

Supreme Court on child porn
Supreme Court on child porn

Jharkhand government approached the Supreme Court seeking contempt of court action against the Union government. The plea comes three months after the Supreme Court collegium recommended Justice M S Ramachandra Rao as the chief justice of Jharkhand. As Justice B R Sarangi retired on July 19, Jharkhand has been without a chief justice for more than two months.

Allegations Of Intentional Delay

The Jharkhand government, which is led by Chief Minister Hemant Soren, alleged on Tuesday that the collegium of the Supreme Court – Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud being a member of that had cautioned about the vacancy and had advised the Chief Justice’s transfer from Himachal Pradesh to Jharkhand. There is no response, however, from the Union government and the Centre shows what the officers of Jharkhand describe as the contempt of the Supreme Court decisions.

This delay violates Article 216 of the Constitution, which simply says that every high court must have a chief justice and other judges. It said that the absence of a chief justice interrupted the judicial process in the state.

---Advertisement---

Legal Questions And Effects

The Supreme Court can file contempt proceedings against anybody not obeying its judgments. Earlier, retired Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul of the Supreme Court had issued a notice warning the Centre for contempt proceedings over the delay by the Centre in collegium decision implementation but let it go there.

Background On Judge Appointments

The collegium system introduced by the Supreme Court during the 1990s gave the collegium the power to appoint judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts. However, no time frame has been given by the Supreme Court regarding the said appointments. While the Centre cannot outright reject a decision of the collegium, it may seek reconsideration from the collegium by highlighting some concerns the Centre feels were not wholly discussed and turned down during the collegium’s process.

A significant opportunity has arisen in the context of recent dialogues related to collegium proposals for the timely completion of appointments and transfers of High Court judges. Attorney General R Venkataramani said he would update on Chief Justices’ appointments next week.

---Advertisement---

HISTORY

Written By

Swechchha Singh


Get Breaking News First and Latest Updates from India and around the world on News24. Follow News24 on Facebook, Twitter.

Related Story

Live News

---Advertisement---


live

India vs Australia, 1st Test Day 2 Highlights: India Lead By 218 Runs At Stumps, Yashasvi Jaiswal & KL Rahul’s Unbreakable Partnership Leave Australia Under Immense Pressure

Nov 23, 2024
India vs Australia, 1st Test Day 2 LIVE Updates
  • 15:24 (IST) 23 Nov 2024

    IND vs AUS, LIVE Updates: Marnus Labuschagne into the attack for the last over of Day 2

  • 15:18 (IST) 23 Nov 2024

    IND vs AUS, LIVE Updates: Nathan Lyon bowls the 56th over

  • 15:14 (IST) 23 Nov 2024

    IND vs AUS, LIVE Updates: Can Yashasvi Jaiswal score his century today?

N24 Shorts Logo

SHORTS

PM Narendra Modi with Eknath Shinde
Beyond News

A Shift Towards BJP's Aggressive Hindutva Amid Opposition's Leadership Crisis

The Maharashtra election may further push the Congress down as it has lost the election at a time when it needed a win most desperately. Though the Congress succeeded in pushing the BJP to a corner and stopping it at less than a majority on its own, it failed to make any headway further.

View All Shorts

---Advertisement---

Trending